McKinsey Quarterly thinks that the United States needs more graduates,
one million graduates each year
by 2020 for better economy. That means increasing the total graduates by 40%. To accomplish this goal, for the next ten
years, all universities should increase the number of its graduates by 3.5%. However,
there are two reasons make it hard mission, First of all, this idea may coast
more than $52 billion a year. States that have financial problems have lowered
spending on higher education. Secondly, universities need to enroll more than
3.5% because only 40% of all students graduate every year.
To achieve the goal with spending
less, colleges should attract more students and keep a tight lid on coasts
without lowering the education qualities or granting access to the best students.
Colleges can be productive by raising graduation rates as controlling costs.
McKinsey examined the
education and management practices of eight collages that its productive levels
up to 60% more than the average, measured by the coast per degree, to
understand what makes them more productive. The colleges are a mix of private
and public institutions. Also, they give degrees after two or four years.
The eight colleges have five strategies help to achieve high productivity:
three strategies that keep costs under control and two that increase the number
of students completing their degrees.
1. Helping
students to graduate.
2. Reducing
unproductive credits.
3. Redesigning
instruction.
4.
Improving efficiency in core support and
services.
5.
Running
noncore services and other operations efficiently and selectively.
First strategy is helping
students to graduate. The eight institutions build up their systems to help as
many students as possible achieve degrees. IndianaWesleyan University’s College of Adult and professional studies (IWU-CAPS) , achieve a six-years graduation rate
of 65% —19 percentage points above its peer average— by encouraging students support each
other. Similarly, In Florida, Valencia communitycollege’s three-year
graduation rate is 35% -- 15 % points above that of peer institutions-- because the collage provides support
and tools for planning the students’ path to graduation and redesigned services
to improve the quality.
The second strategy is reducing
the unnecessary credits. There is 10% of all credits are excess of the number
of required to graduate. Even though these credits are good for students, they
add cost to a degree. For example, Southern New Hampshire University allows students to
graduate with no more than 150 credits.
Third one is about how using
new technology can lower the coasts and raise the qualities. In Arizona, Rio Salado college substitutes part-time for
full-time faculty. Also, some institutions developed new material called “master
courses” instead of asking professors to create their own materials. The technology
is not the only way to cut teaching coasts. Brigham Young University- Idaho adds a third (full spring) semester) to the calendar.
As a result, the coasts of teaching were cut by 32% per student.
The fourth strategy is how reduce the cost of core support and
services. Idaho, Rio Salado, and DeVry University succeeded reducing costs in
this area by converting paper-based systems to electronic ones, cross-training
to eliminate staff downtime, and using self-service online portals to
administer financial aid. Also, in the fifth strategy, these universities reduced the costs by paying closer attention
to mandatory operations while improving efficiency across all noncore services.
To get the extra million graduates necessitates lowering the nation’s
average cost per degree by 23 percent, and this assumes rising the total
tuition revenues in line with student numbers but not rising in tuition fees.
Finally, the impact of the five strategies shows that these strategies
play a useful role in achieving the goal. Therefore, institutions can raise
their productivities if they apply these five important strategies. Both State
and federal governments should add the productivity in their higher education’s
plans through the data that is provided via institutions.
I think it’s always good thing to help students graduate although as you mentioned, it will be difficult because of the costs. That’s awesome what they’re doing in Florida to boost their student support services to help more students. The reduction of excess credits has me a little concerned. I mean it’s great to focus on classes that only pertain to one’s degree, but the electives are what makes a student well rounded to society and the world.
ReplyDeleteI’m a little confused of the third strategy. Whereas saving money is the goal, how can using new technology be cheaper than old technology? Also, although it might save money to streamline instruction, I know professors are in the profession to educate people and people have many ways of learning. So I don’t know if professors would like their curriculums already planned for them. I like the fourth strategy. Going green is always a good way to go! I don’t understand how the fifth strategy works. I attempted to use the link but I didn’t find the article. It sounds like they did an overhaul of their departments and tightened up the ship. Thanks for the post Rahman ☺